Hello, readers! You’ll be happy to know that the holiday squeeze has lightened somewhat. Unfortunately, however, it has made posting here a little difficult for the moment.
The good news is that I should be back to a regular posting schedule next week. 😉 Until then, take a look at this helpful article from K. M. Weiland:
Last month, I invited you to tell me what topics you’d like me to write about. You flooded my inbox and comments section with suggestions. (I scheduled this as an “easy” post that wouldn’t require much maintenance while I was in the midst of the a big move. When I logged on that first day to over a hundred comments needing to be approved, I was all, Wha? Gah— Ahhh!)
I’m psyched by your enthusiasm—and excited to have such a deep well of ideas to draw from for future posts. So, first off—thank you for contributing to the discussion!
And, second, let’s get started…
How Do You Know When Enough Is Enough?
One of the first questions in the queue to catch my eye was Karen Keil’s:
My biggest issues have to do with the term “enough.” How do I know when I have described enough, not described enough, edited enough, not edited enough, dialogued enough, not dialogued enough, been humorous enough… etc.
One of the most difficult things about the art form of writing is how… unquantifiable many aspects are.
What is story but a great big blast of colors and feels right smack in your face?
As a reader or viewer, you just know when something works or it doesn’t. (Lack of artistic credentials has never been—nor ever should be—enough to hold anyone back from passionately loving or hating a piece of art). Explaining the whyof any particular technique’s success or lack thereof is much harder. Indeed, even identifying which particular technique is at play sometimes seems like trying to figure out what the elephant is by poking at it in the dark.